What the heck is a “Quadrant Foul?

Defining_Small (1) (1)_Page_3

Defining_Small (1) (1)_Page_4

Defining_Small (1) (1)_Page_5

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then the right diagram is worth at least ten thousand.  I am very grateful  Jim Heid of Urban Green has boiled down the difference between Large and Master Planned Development and Small and Incremental Development into the series of excellent diagrams above.

I recently had a conversation with a bright guy in a Masters in Real Estate Development program at a serious university.  He was wondering if a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) would be a good vehicle for people in a local community to be able to invest in small projects in their neighborhood.  Just to set things straight, a REIT would not be a good vehicle for this as a REIT has to have a lot of property under management to justify their existence and overhead, so the structure would be way beyond the scale of small projects in a specific neighborhood.  Investors would own shares in an outfit that owns a large portfolio of a specific type of real estate.

-But the conversation reminded me of Jim Heid’s diagram.  The kind of  local in the neighborhood projects my grad student friend was describing belong in the lower left quadrant of Jim’s diagram, the Small and Incremental/Entrepreneurial and Bootstrapped territory.  Ownership of real estate by a REIT belongs up in the Corporate and Institutional/Large and Master Planned upper right quadrant.  We might want to bring established tried and true tools scaled for the upper right quadrant to bear on projects in the lower left, but often the scale is just…off.  I think we can call that a Quadrant Foul.

Rethinking the development business model for Small Developers will continues to uncover habits that may serve folks doing large project well that need to be substantially retooled to work in small projects, or they may just need to be set aside as because they are not fit to the purpose.

 

2 thoughts on “What the heck is a “Quadrant Foul?

  1. lonigray23 March 14, 2016 / 8:28 pm

    Beyond the fact that an REIT requires a minimum of 100 investors, I think it’s also important to realize that with REIT’s there’s no inherent sense that they’re investing in something real – their community. By that I mean, when you get dividends from them REIT (rather than rent or depreciation,) it feels like a mutual fund. In small incremental projects, you want your investors to have a tangible feel that they’re investing in the bricks n sticks of the communities that they care about.

    My ULI colleague and I are shaping an effort right now that trains and supports local nimble housing engines (design and small scale developers), connects them to local responsible investors and properties. We WANT them to feel and see what their dollars do!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s